• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Cric Hindi News

  • National
  • Lifestyle
  • International
  • Entertainment
  • Sports

RTI activist who raised questions on road construction did not get bail even from the Supreme Court, said – this has become a new business

June 15, 2026 by Uma Shankar

RTI activist Rakesh Kumar Bahl, who is accused of obstructing road construction work, has got a blow from the Supreme Court. The court has refused to grant him anticipatory bail on Monday (June 15). The bench of Justice Sandeep Mehta and Justice Vijay Bishnoi made sharp comments during the hearing and said that RTI activism has now become a new business.

The bench of Justice Sandeep Mehta and Justice Vijay Bishnoi upheld the order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, in which the bail plea of ​​Rakesh Kumar Bahl was rejected. During the hearing, Justice Mehta said in a strict tone, ‘RTI activist has become a new business. The central government has released funds, it will take care of the road construction. You are nobody. So called RTI activist! ‘Yellow Journalism’.

Justice Bishnoi raised questions

Justice Bishnoi also raised the question as to why Rakesh Bahl was monitoring the road construction. He asked who are you who is monitoring the road construction or its progress? Are you a high official? The court upheld the order of Punjab and Haryana High Court not to grant anticipatory bail.

what is the allegation

According to the information, Rakesh Kumar Bahal and another accused are accused of stopping the work of the road under construction and threatening the complainant and the workers who were monitoring the work. Along with this, it is alleged that Bahl assaulted the complainant, while the other accused kicked him. Apart from this, there has also been an allegation of making caste based derogatory remarks against the workers.

High Court also refused to grant bail

After this, FIR was registered under sections 304(2), 132, 221, 121(1), 351(2), 351(3) of BNS, 2023 (section 3(5), 121(2) of BNS, 2023 and section 3(1) of SC/ST Act. The Punjab and Haryana High Court had also accepted that the allegations in the FIR show direct and clear involvement in obstructing government work. On this basis the High Court had refused to grant anticipatory bail. Now the Supreme Court has also refused to grant bail to Bahl.

About Uma Shankar

Uma Shankar writes about finance, business, and investment topics. He simplifies complex subjects like stock market, banking, tax, and cryptocurrency to help readers make informed financial decisions. Data-driven reporting is his strength.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Mother had stopped her with mud, the girl made all the mud her playground, viral video reminded people of childhood
  • Abhay Verma, Anil Sharma and Harish Khurana…Delhi government got 3 spokespersons, CM Rekha said this
  • Punjab Police attacks drug network, hundreds of smugglers arrested, panic among those doing ‘poison business’
  • Sophie Ecclestone: Had ‘imprisoned’ herself for 5 days, was not mentally well, now created history at Lord’s
  • Uproar in Datia, District President resigns… Why did Narottam Mishra not get the ticket? Inside Story

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Archives

  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026

Categories

  • Entertainment
  • International
  • Lifestyle
  • National
  • Sports

Copyright © 2026