• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Cric Hindi News

  • National
  • Lifestyle
  • International
  • Entertainment
  • Sports

Shock for actress Jacqueline in Rs 200 crore case? Justice Mishra separated from the Supreme Court bench

June 11, 2026 by Uma Shankar

Supreme Court judge Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra on Thursday recused himself from hearing the petition of Bollywood actress Jacqueline Fernandez, in which she had appealed against the Delhi Court order framing charges against her in a money laundering case of Rs 200 crore.

Initially, a Partial Working Day (PWD) bench of Justices Mishra and Atul S Chandurkar heard the actress’s lawyer and Enforcement Directorate Told that the matter would be sent to another bench.

Justice Mishra said, there is something difficult. In one of the cases related to this, my son had appeared for the government. (This case) will be presented on June 25 before a bench in which none of us are members. On May 30, a Delhi court had ordered framing of charges against the actor, alleged swindler Sukesh Chandrashekhar and 15 others in a Rs 200 crore money laundering case.

Jacqueline knocked on the door of the Supreme Court

The trial court had also directed that charges be framed against Chandrashekhar and 20 others for various offenses under stringent MCOCA provisions in another case registered by the special cell of the city police.

The actress approached the Supreme Court against the order. Jacqueline, who was summoned by the ED several times in connection with the investigation, was made an accused for the first time in the supplementary chargesheet filed by the agency.

ED had made these allegations against Jacqueline

The ED, in its second supplementary complaint against Jacqueline, alleged that she was in constant touch with Chandrashekhar and had received expensive gifts from him through his associate Pinky Irani. According to the prosecution, Chandrashekhar was running an organized criminal network from inside the jail and was impersonating senior government officials, including the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO), Ministry of Home Affairs and Ministry of Law and Justice.

It claimed that by using spoofed calls, encrypted applications and fake identities, the accused induced complainant Aditi Singh and her family members to pay huge amounts of money.

Read this also- Do you know what happens to the goods seized by ED, when can the government sell it?

About Uma Shankar

Uma Shankar writes about finance, business, and investment topics. He simplifies complex subjects like stock market, banking, tax, and cryptocurrency to help readers make informed financial decisions. Data-driven reporting is his strength.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Garuda Purana Shradh: Can a daughter perform the Shraddha rituals of her parents if she does not have a son? Know the rules of Garuda Purana
  • Enjoy ropeway at these beautiful places in India, you will see amazing views.
  • Rashmika Mandanna remained underwater for 20 hours, did the most difficult stunt for Mysaa without a body double
  • Hina And Rubina: Rubina Dilaik and Hina Khan got into trouble by commenting on Akanksha-Shilpa, they are the mistresses of crores.
  • IND vs ENG: 2 players out of Team India, Sanju also has no place, this is the Playing XI in the fourth T20

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Archives

  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026

Categories

  • Entertainment
  • International
  • Lifestyle
  • National
  • Sports

Copyright © 2026